Perspective on H. Shodan (P. Nidan)

Notes on the applications that are visible in Itosu's Heian Shodan kata. (This would be Pinan Nidan for traditionalists.)
Forum rules
You may visit as a guest and read everything. You may register and post messages. I reserve the right to control site content.

-- Kyoshi Clayton

Perspective on H. Shodan (P. Nidan)

Postby HanshiClayton » Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:15 am

It is important for us to understand that Heian Shodan (Shotokan) is Pinan Nidan (other styles). In the original Heian/Pinan series, the first kata taught to beginners was our Heian Nidan.

Itosu's Heian (Pinan) katas were first performed in public around 1905. It seems apparent that he didn't share the applications of the katas with any of his students, leaving us a gigantic puzzle to unravel.

By 1920 (or so), Itosu's senior students were in Japan establishing various karate "styles." They taught the Heians to their students, and the Japanese, true to their nature, froze the katas as immutable lessons from the masters. With small exceptions, the Heian/Pinan katas have remained unchanged to the present day.

How, then, do we account for the fact that each style has its own, wildly different, set of Heians? In addition, each style has a different set of applications to demonstrate for each kata. The answer is that Okinawan karate masters expected their students to change and adapt the katas, and they did. In the fifteen years between their introduction and their fossilization, the katas changed remarkably down multiple independent paths.

This gives us an interesting opportunity. When we attempt to match applications to katas, we can view the katas in other styles to see whether this move appears everywhere, or is only in Shotokan. Sometimes the katas of other styles lend context to our part of the puzzle. It is always worthwhile to look.

Comparing Shotokan's H. Shodan to its counterparts in other styles, we note immediately that the embusen (floor plan) of the kata is different. Some styles use Shotokan's H-shaped pattern ( |---| ). Others use Itosu's original embusen, which looks more like a double-headed arrow ( <---> ). The "wings" of the kata used to be performed at an angle. This could have implications for applications.

There is a sharp distinction between Shotokan and non-Shotokan styles in step 1 of H. shodan. Instead of a front stance and downblock in step 1, the non-Shotokan styles do a hammerfist at shoulder level. They either pivot in place in cat stance, or they shift backwards into cat stance on step 1! These styles do a vertical hammerfist:

This style does a horizontal hammerfist in step 1:

These groups perform step 1 as a downblock in front stance:

The opening downblock seems to be "Shotokan only." (Wado and Robukai got their heians from Shotokan.) If so, then the hammerfist is the original technique.

In Step 4 of the kata we pull back, swing our fist in a circle, and then attack with a hammerfist. All branches of karate begin this sequence in a front stance and downblock posture, and then pull back to a semi-upright stance. Some branches remain in the upright stance while executing the hammerfist; other branches give power to the hammerfist by dropping into front stance again.

Upright hammerfist:

Dropping hammerfist:

I would say that dropping down into front stance to augment the hammerfist is a mutation added to Shotokan after 1924. Non-Shotokans don't do this move, and early Shotokans didn't, either.

Step 6 is the left downblock followed by an open-handed upblock with the same hand. All Shotokan groups that I have seen perform the upblock completely before beginning to step forward for the next move.

Non-Shotokan groups either skip the open-handed upblock completely, or perform it as a fleeting stackup before the upblock in step 7:

Another place where the katas differ is in the three upblocks (step 7-9). Some Shotokan groups do normal beginner upblocks here (fist closed). Other groups do an upblock and then open the hand into shuto position at the top of the block before stepping forward. I learned it with the shuto; was firmly admonished never to do shutos; and was then excoriated for failing to do shutos. None of the masters in question could explain why to do it or why not to do it. This is one of the places where Shotokan masters are a little bit insane.

Branches that do the shuto at the top of the block:

Branches that omit the shuto at the top of the block:

And a surprise! The Shotokai branch does shuto upblocks and never make a fist during the upblocks:

Some styles do deep front stances for downblocks, but then use stiff-legged upright stances for the following front punches.

Upright front punches:

Deeply-extended front punches:

Some groups do middle-level knife-hand blocks at the end of the kata. Others do knife-hand downblocks instead.

Knife-hand downblocks:

Mid-level knife-hand blocks:


Even with these discrepancies noted, it is largely the same kata everywhere it is practiced. Downblocks; front punches; upblocks; knife-hand strikes. The differences are consistent with the philosophies of the founding masters of the different systems.
Bruce D. Clayton, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved.
This forum is supported by the sales of Shotokan's Secret, Expanded Edition
HanshiClayton
Site Founder
Site Founder
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:45 pm

Re: Perspective on H. Shodan (P. Nidan)

Postby simsan50 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:07 am

I recently received my copy of your new book and I really appreciate your efforts and reasoning. Thanks!
did you consider Nishiyama sensei in your groupings or is ertl and benedickson that groups representation? Just wondering.
Again, thanks for your hard work and willingness to share.
mike sims
simsan50
Yondan
Yondan
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:00 am

Re: Perspective on H. Shodan (P. Nidan)

Postby HanshiClayton » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:57 am

simsan50 wrote:Did you consider Nishiyama sensei in your groupings or is ertl and benedickson that groups representation?
mike sims


I did not include Nishiyama Sensei for multiple reasons, one of which is that I never saw him teach a kata. He also didn't publish a kata book, nor a DVD, so there wasn't anything to work with. Lastly, I wanted to leave him some plausible deniability about the things I was learning in my research. I did not want my writings to reflect on him in any way.

In every seminar I attended with Master Nishiyama, his emphasis was on speed and power through "basic principles." My notes on that subject are in a nearby forum, where Nishiyama is credited quite heavily.
Bruce D. Clayton, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2012, All Rights Reserved.
This forum is supported by the sales of Shotokan's Secret, Expanded Edition
HanshiClayton
Site Founder
Site Founder
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:45 pm


Return to Heian Shodan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron
Hit Counter by Digits