Nothingfancy wrote:As a kicker I must ask, what was NothingFancy's expectation when he launched that front kick?
Colin, To be honest I had a huge adrenaline rush at that point. I thought the kick may serve two purposes, 1. to put a moments distance between myself and he, and 2., a "warning shot" of sorts, had I not been sucker-punched, it was on my mind to have pivoted to face the next person. I think the adrenaline and the hit in the temple changed my whole demeanor. I sort of had "tunnel vision" after that.
KyoshiClayton wrote:Hi, Colin. Nice to know the old guys can still beat up the newbies.colinwee wrote:For this discussion, if any one of you saw several guys who've literally come out of their dark alleyway to accost you ... what would 1) reduce the threat posed by your new friends, and 2) what would tip the scales in your favour?
I think the right answer is the classic "Run away!" That said, I was never any good at running. I teach my students not to run "away," but to run toward something. Run toward lights. Run into traffic. Run toward weapons. Run toward anything that alters the tactical situation. And in particular, get some distance from that alley! They picked that spot for its privacy.
.Please know I don't mean to be discourteous
The eyes are actually a lot more robust than people give them credit for. We automatically close our eye when they are attacked. Attacking the eye directly it is very easy to damage it, but beating the blink reflex is extremely hard. I work as a Doorman and I've had my thumb buried into a few eyes now and have to say that it serves more effect in damaging the recipient mentally than it does physically.
A couple of years ago me and colleague was dragging a guy out for doing cocaine and I started to loose the lock I had on him because he was turning his way of it. Anyway I messed up a bit and put my fingers too close to his mouth and he bit my little finger down to the bone. I stuck my thumb into his eye as hard as I could, which I honestly believe is the only reason I still have the top of the finger left. The only ill effects the guy had was a totally bloodshot and watery eye.
I had a guy put his thumb in my eye once. It wasnt comfortable, but it was far from deadly either. He slipped when I turned my head and his thumb ended up in my mouth. I nearly removed it for him. I ended up with a black eye from the thumb. Thats it.
I remember one "friendly" scuffle I was in which resulted in five of us being locked in a pitch black box car used for storage. There were alot of objects in there and we were still going at it pretty hard (stop it perverts!)when I caught a thumb to my eye that felt like it tickled the back of my skull. I wanted to stop immediately and get help,but I had to wait until the melee deceased,which was a few more minutes.
After the smoke cleared my eye was red with blood,but not bleeding. It bothered me for about two days and was fine after that.
Hd this been a real fight I would have continued,but with mucho rage and aggression.
colinwee wrote:I don't know if it's so much traditional karate (or in my case traditional taekwondo) that teaches us to lose fights. It's what we value in our training and what we're setting ourselves up for.
colinwee wrote:As Kyoshi Clayton communicates in his book you need to finish your opponent in one or two techniques. I'm sure he said that somewhere in his book!
PLopresti wrote:This is where you use your environment to help defend yourself. You may use a wall, corner, vehicle, dumpster to defend your back. Watch someone throw full force into your face when they can bust their hands on the concrete behind you with a small slip.
PLopresti wrote:We all know now that the prescribed "Best Karate" Shotokan series books and the copycats do not contain accurate interpretations of the kata movements. This is well documented and one of the reasons we have this forum.
PLopresti wrote:Why did Funakoshi say it took him 3 years to learn one kata????? It because it took him that long to study it in depth.
colinwee wrote:A significant part of my training is for home intrusion ... so no, running away is not really an option. I guess if my family wasn't in the house that's a good option. But if they're there, I've got to stay and fight.
NothingFancy wrote:I just did a cursery google search of "reaction to eye gouge" and on an old thread from England, this is what I found.
LaVerne wrote:Granted, it is unlikely that he really should have gotten out of the car at all, but the instant there were three of them against one of him, he should have been thinking WEAPON for himself. He had available an excellent weapon, a superb weapon - his CAR.
PLopresti wrote:So we can all see and agree that this is not how we would encounter most real life self defense situations with the exception of the bar encounter where, as gentelmen, we ask our adversary to politely step outside.
Nakayama deliberately made up impractical applications for his American students to practice as punishment for their bad manners in asking about applications. Fifty years later we are still trying to block groin kicks in horse stance using returning-wave kicks. He was laughing at us then and he's laughing at us now
Nothingfancy wrote:Just when did the practitioners begin to delve into the "masked' techniques? And are you familiar with that English gentleman Geoff Thompson?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests